back to MAIN BLOG PAGE




I AM SHARING THIS WITH YOU

Saturday, October 02, 2004
 
OK. So, blogging is basically impossible. But here:
  • How Berkeley Can You Be? parade photo essay — absolutely hilarious. (Via Nelson's Weblog, which has become a favorite.)
  • Terizm, Terizm, Terizm - also hilarious, but for all the wrong reasons. (Via Joi.)
  • Today's best spam subject line: "gesticulating still more anxiously" - indeed!
  • At Web 2.0, but I don't have time to blog it. Jeremy Zawodny, on the other hand, is the new Heath Row — he's covering it intensely.
  • Ev says goodbye and Ben and Mena take 10m in funding. There you go!
  • If you read the same blogs as me, you'll have seen the oft-acerbic and oft-intelligent remarks by the prolific commenter pb@pb.com — the best thing thing to come out of Web 2.0 for me is that I now know the real identity of pb@pb.com.

I've had this post about Adam Bosworth, Alchemy and the Google browser sitting around for months now and it is driving me crazy, because I want all the credit for guessing this before it happens. So, for the record, if Google is making a browser, and if it is going to be successful, it will be because there is a sophisticated local caching framework included, and Google will provide the reference apps (replying to emails on Gmail or posting messages to Google groups while on the plane).

` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` `
Comments:
Ah yes! "evil pb" as I call him. I was happy to finally put a name and a face with a psuedonym last year (and I'm joking saying "evil" here, just because his opinions differ so much from the pb I know that also comments with the name pb on blogs).
 
Don't you dare "out" pb@pb.com. I want to be one of the few people who knows who he is. Plus, if you out him, then he'll tone it down, and what fun would that be.
 
Usurper!
 
As user #4, you'd be pretty hard to usurp, no? I don't think anyone confuses pb@pb.com with "nice pb" ;)
 
Post a Comment






pub. w. blogger