|
||
service noticeOh, who am I fooling anymore? I am never going to finish this. Better to just start over. Most of it is not broken.This site is maintained by Stewart Butterfield: stewart@sylloge.com |
most recentlyTuesday, October 31
Non-reflog: Lots of good comics can be found in this MetaFilter thread (but when will Leisure Town return?!). And the deadline for the Web4096 contest (as in 4096 byters, an even tighter constraint than the 5k) is approaching. At least I think it is, but the site is down right now.
Stewart! Welcome to the capital markets! Your participation is valued. Here are some things to remember to browse further:
Wednesday, October 18
The rule is very simple,' says Lt. Lloyd Manseau, the commanding officer of security. 'Everything is worth something in here. Nothing goes to waste. Except, of course, lives.'(via the blorg) Friday, October 13
- An article on the focus group gurus behind the proliferation of modern uniform political linguistic constructions (and the "infinite regress of opinion formation"). - A bunch of Joseph Kennedy's letters wherein his middling intelligence is made plain. - An article on Midland, Texas (George W. Bush's ol' hometown). - A survey of politicians reading habits, leading to some humorously contextualized GWB flubs: Would the survivors of Gettysburg not have nodded their weary heads at Bush's thrilling line "We must all hear the universal call to like your neighbor just like you like to be liked yourself"? Has anyone summed up the blood-filled rift between North and South with more tragic bafflement: "It was us versus them, and it was clear who the them was. Today, we're not so sure who the they are, but we know they're there"? Above all, how could Lincoln not have heeded the despairing, Old Testament cry of 'Is our children learning?" And, if they isn't, then which of we is showing they the way? - And most of all the mis-subtitled "Eight Years: Bill Clinton looks back on his Presidency" (it should have been "Joe Klein [political reporter and at-the-time-anonymous author of "Primary Colors"] looks back on Bill Clinton's Presidency"). Though my own estimation often differed from Klein's frequently evidenced but clearly distinguished opinions, the article was truly riveting. What I found most interesting was how well the usually overlooked (inter-) personal side of Washington politics was illustrated. It so often escapes our collective notice that the gumm'nt is made up of real people and a lot of them have to cöoperate for anything to happen. Complex system indeed.
Of course, tech support had no idea that my account was shut off and couldn't figure out what was wrong. We tried uninstalling things, removing things, resetting things, changing settings, powering off, and many long pauses for rebooting. Notice that I say "of course" in that first sentence. Of course the people on the second floor had no idea what the people on the third floor were doing, because phone companies seem to be inherently and essentially stupid. It is a generic property of the class of complex systems to which "phone company" belongs.
McSweeney's Internet Tendency: Ben Greenman's Fun With Time On the subway, set your watch one hour behind. Pretend that an hour is 100 million years, and that you are in the Cenomanian Age. Look around for dinosaurs, particularly hadrosaurs.(via Late-night pool, which was found from good ol' Geegaw) I then I found this strange juxtaposition when poking around in my misc_bin (in an HTML file last modified June 15, 2000). Section 107 of Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations, cut 'n' paste from these excerpts. This became a line in Derek Jarman's so-so 1993 film Wittgenstein and struck me as one of the 10 most important remarks in the investigations (the essentially idea, friction as a requirement, is as important in considering one's life as it is considering philosophy of language). § 107 The more narrowly we examine actual language, the sharper becomes the conflict between it and our requirement. (For the crystalline purity of logic was, of course, not a result of investigation: it was a requirement.) The conflict becomes intolerable; the requirement is now in danger of becoming empty. — We have got on to slippery ice where there is no friction and so in a certain sense the conditions are ideal, but also, just because of that, we are unable to walk. We want to walk: so we need friction. Back to the rough ground!Followed by (presumably from The Onion, though I had no link in the source) ... Efforts Of World's 16 Billion Chickens Still Not Adding Up To Much
Amsterdam, November 11, 12 & 13 2000 I'm making progress on my notes and I'll post them here as soon as I can.
BEGIN(via calebos.org)
"America's surreal hypocrisy about recreational drugs has reached the full-blown Dali stage."(via eatonweb) Wednesday, October 11 Without DSL Internet cafe again But I get more done It's is amazing how inconvenient it is for your DSL to go down at the same time as your office fades away ...
Continuity depends on the condition that between any two states there exists still another. It also means sensations of states cannot be disjoint: a neighboring state must appear, and feel, nearly like the present state.But, strictly speaking, in a continuum, there is no concept of neighbo(u)r for "between any two states [points] there exists still another". A friend with whom I've fallen out of touch was writing a book on the history of the idea of continuum it is a wonderful topic. Saturday, October 7
Wednesday, October 4 When You Have 3 Small Children... Monday, October 2
There seems to be a certain chicness to demonstrating these days, as evidenced by the sort of person who attended both the Seattle and DC demonstrations earlier this year. Not quite sure why. Perhaps it lends a simulacrum of authenticity of otherwise banal lives.Abashed agreement here. (Via email from jlg.)
I should also clarify that my issue's with Julie's piece linked from my rant below are much fewer than I implied (my vitriol, such as it was, was directed towards various straw people and some real people who post to MetaFilter, which seems to be coming up a lot lately). I take all the points we agree on for granted, so all that I saw are the points on which we disagree (such as whether businesses growing larger disempowers communities or whether there is an inverse relationship between profit and morally correct behaviour). I agree with her bottom line: Economic Democracy, the concept of creating change through one's economic votes, gives people that power [to influence social responsibility or the lack thereof in business practices].This agenda is constructive and I apologize for giving the impression that I thought it wasn't. My frustration was latent and was merely provoked by sentiments I sensed being expressed in a number of places and I happened to be reading that at the time. On the other hand, fuck you if you think I'm a criminal. (See above.)
|
Here are some of the other things on this site: The 5k contest Stephen Toulmin's 1979 Ryerson Lecture at the University of Chicago, The Inwardness of Mental Life, reprinted with the kind permission of the Author & the University. An excerpt from an interview with philosopher Donald Davidson, which I find complements the former. A motion study where you can see all the frames of an animation at once, but also still see the animation. Some pictures of my friend Paul spinning around in some art, which is really a machine. Some pictures of Illuminares, Vancouver's annual latern festival. Some pictures of The Symphony of Fire, Vancouver's annual fireworks competition. A video from my second trip to Vegas in the year 2000. Sad, that. And more, to be dusted off. |